Skip to main content
Romanian Market News Banner

   .BUSINESS    .FINANCE    .INVESTMENTS    .STOCK EX    .COMPANIES    .LEGAL & TAX 


 

Journalists around the world continue to lose their lives for doing their jobs

World Press Freedom Day: In 2017, 79 journalists were assassinated worldwide in the exercise of their profession. 
posted onMay 3, 2018
nocomment

Every year, 3 May is a date which celebrates the fundamental principles of press freedom, to evaluate press freedom around the world, to defend the media from attacks on their independence and to pay tribute to journalists who have lost their lives in the exercise of their profession.

World Press Freedom Day was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in 1993 following a Recommendation adopted at the twenty-sixth session of UNESCO's General Conference in 1991. This in turn was a response to a call by African journalists who in 1991 produced the landmark Windhoek Declaration on media pluralism and independence. 

It serves as an occasion to inform citizens of violations of press freedom - a reminder that in dozens of countries around the world, publications are censored, fined, suspended and closed down, while journalists, editors and publishers are harassed, attacked, detained and even murdered.

It is a date to encourage and develop initiatives in favour of press freedom, and to assess the state of press freedom worldwide.

3 May acts as a reminder to governments of the need to respect their commitment to press freedom and is also a day of reflection among media professionals about issues of press freedom and professional ethics. Just as importantly, World Press Freedom Day is a day of support for media which are targets for the restraint, or abolition, of press freedom. It is also a day of remembrance for those journalists who lost their lives in the pursuit of a story.

In 2017, 79 journalists were assassinated worldwide in the exercise of their profession. In 2018, the state of free expression around the world continues its downward spiral. In a report published a few days ago by Reporters Without Borders (RSF) there is very little to celebrate.

World Press Freedom Index 2017

The 2018 World Press Freedom Index, compiled by RSF, reflects growing animosity towards journalists. Hostility towards the media, openly encouraged by political leaders, and the efforts of authoritarian regimes to export their vision of journalism pose a threat to democracies. 

“The unleashing of hatred towards journalists is one of the worst threats to democracies,” RSF secretary-general Christophe Deloire said. “Political leaders who fuel loathing for reporters bear heavy responsibility because they undermine the concept of public debate based on facts instead of propaganda. To dispute the legitimacy of journalism today is to play with extremely dangerous political fire.” 

In this year’s Index, Norway is first for the second year running, followed – as it was last year – by Sweden (2nd) while the Netherlands replaced Finland in third place. Europe, the region where press freedom is the safest, is where the regional indicator has worsened most this year. Four of this year’s five biggest falls in the Index are those of European countries: Malta (down 18 at 65th), Czech Republic (down 11 at 34th), Serbia (down 10 at 76th) and Slovakia (down 10 at 27th) 

The country that made the biggest jump on the list was Gambia, which jumped 22 spots to reach number 122.

Turkmenistan, Eritrea and North Korea are this year’s worst offenders — just as they were last year.

Published annually by RSF since 2002, the World Press Freedom Index measures the level of media freedom in 180 countries, including the level of pluralism, media independence, the environment and self-censorship, the legal framework, transparency, and the quality of the infrastructure that supports the production of news and information. It does not evaluate government policy. 

The global indicator and the regional indicators are calculated on the basis of the scores assigned to each country. These country scores are calculated from answers to a questionnaire in 20 languages that is completed by experts around the world, supported by a qualitative analysis. The scores and indicators measure constraints and violations, so the higher the figure, the worse the situation. Because of growing awareness of the Index, it is an extremely useful advocacy tool.